Talk:Endless Summer, Book 3/@comment-26069469-20180414033819/@comment-34608699-20180416221036

Not really. I mean depending of how you look at it, it can be a good ending or a bad ending. Rourke's ending is considered a bad one because he wins and its kind of a hell in earth; but this ending also implies that the group would rise to defeat him again. So if you like "never ending adventures" this ending would be for you.

Endless ending is tricky. If you choose this ending i suppose you care more about the MC's friends than the world in general. So yeah the world burns and the group misses their old lifes in earth. But they arent "living" sad. They are going to live the rest of their lives in paradise ... more or less. And this would pretty much mean humanity in the future will reside in La Huerta.

Vanu's ending in my opinion was the best. You stop existing but you save EVERYONE. Literally every character that died by the ripples of Rourke's plan and even people that burned with earth. You revert everything to their optimal condition. Its also very well done since it brings closure to the player by having all the friends remembering and mourning him. Not like ILITW where Connor was the only one who actually seemed to be sad about you ... im still salty about it.