Thread:Dudey111/@comment-4786757-20171102022752/@comment-33525200-20171103150622

@Gogobell: I appreciate you taking the time to do so. However, Fearless Diva had already sent me that image. The problem with it is that Fandom staff only looked at my post on Andy and deemed it transphobic. They have little to no interest in reading any of what I have written, either here or on Wolf's page where I explain how I do not view it as transphobic, especially​ as defined by Merriam-Webster's dictionary. I don't know if you saw it or not, but I went far more in-depth on the definition of both transphobia and discrimination in this post. Whether you agree with it or not is your opinion, which you are completely entitled to have and express.

@Fearless Diva: See what I mean about offense? I said "I understand that these arguments might be beyond your capability to understand, so I do not expect you to actually reply to any of them." Ugh, I can't believe I have to explain this to you. The word "might" indicates that it may or may not be within your intellectual capability. In no way is it a personal attack. You say I haven't read your replies, yet I have gone through your replies sentence-by-sentence and provided valid counterarguments to every one of your statements. Here's a list of issues you have not replied to me about.

1. Transgenders have more rights than I do in this Wikia.

2. Your ban is a perfect example of closed-mindedness. I could also argue for admin abuse, but that's not what I care about.

3. Offensive statements swing both ways, yet apparently the interests of only one group of people matters. All others are cast aside.

4. The issue with my original post. Apparently misgendering is RUDE to transgenders. Yet you never explained how it is discriminatory. More specifically, as an advocate of biological science, shouldn't I be finding transsexuality discriminatory against my beliefs? This ties into my first point

5. Censoring my opinion goes against diversity and inclusiveness.

6. Could you attempt to explain any of my examples? I gave you scientific examples of why I don't agree with transsexuality (once again, my opinions) to counter Sannse's argument about racism, yet you remained quiet on that.

I really wish there was a way I could contact Sannse. Chances are, he/she will express the same closed-mindedness and preferential treatment as you have, sadly. However, as I pointed out in the article, there doesn't seem to be an end to this circle of closed-mindedness through this lack of diversity of opinions.