Thread:MondlichtPanda/@comment-4786757-20200629211008/@comment-37915141-20200710224437

Andisimon wrote:

8emi, I don't have any of those... Okay, is there any place I can message you privately? Because I can't talk about my findings publicly.

Fearless Diva wrote:

8emi: I have twitter (AgentRose07) and reddit (u/Fearless_Diva) You want me to message you with the answer instead? I already told Jade though.

Anyway, long story short. I didn't find... much and now think the other version is deleted and there's only one. If that makes sense. But I have no proof and haven't done tests. Nor do I have time to get into testing it again now either. Maybe later.

Jadelady wrote:

Yeah, I wasn't sure how we wanted to do it. If you have a crush on someone, does that mean you're sexually attracted to that person? So if half the school has a crush on the professor including Chloe, does that make her "want" the professor? If "crush" = "attracted to", then LGBT would fit. But since I wasn't sure about the nuance, I left the category alone myself. I know someone else put it on, but I didn't realize Diva reverted it. A crush is supposed to be romantic attraction. And homoromantic attraction still falls under LGBTQ+. I could go into how a crush is often regarded the same as sexual attraction because some (if not most) people don't even know that there could be a difference, but others do experience the differences, and I could go onto speculating what the writers thought. But I'm pretty sure they didn't think about it that hard. I would say since Chloe crush on female Kingsley too it means she's possibly LGBTQ+ since technically the HSSCA characters didn't go further than romantic stuff (obviously because they're minor) yet some of them are still considered LGBTQ+.