Talk:Veil of Secrets/@comment-34296592-20180816083912/@comment-3452092-20180816153918

Yeah, the only way I see Kate being guilty is if she has an accompice who is responcible for Bryce (I vote Duffy, because with how Walsh treats him, I can see him becoming completely loyal to someone who treated him well).

I don't see her being guilty. For one, I think we learn the truth before Agent Kim arrives and if she was guilty I don't think we would come to him unless we were making ourselves an accomplice after the fact. . . which I will be extremely mad at Pixelberry if they do that. And secondly, if she was really going to kill Tanner, why on earth would she do it before she married him. He was clearly set to marry her (unless that was for show and he did something to her which set off the chain of events or else he was planning on humiliating her by saying he wouldn't marry her . . . both of which would embarrass him, so I doubt it), so why not marry him, potentially get access to his money (if she really was a gold digger), and then kill him. It doesn't make sense that she wouldn't marry him first if she was what the Sterlings and Walsh claim. What on earth does she gain. Tanner was going to marry her, so the idea that he wasn't is crazy unless he was involved in the whole thing and seeing as he's the first to die, that makes no sense.