Thread:Fearless Diva/@comment-36277500-20190303102351/@comment-36277500-20190306151939

Oooh kaayy...

Speaking about blabbering and gibberish, I particularly mean article about "Caesar" actor.

The topic is written in such puritan way, suggesting than actor had "enlarged armor and prowess" - WTF? Raping "Pompey" Actor in front of Senate, what "prowess" it proves? If the author actually understood English text which they copied-and-pasted carelessly, they would also understood latter text about bulge under his abdomen, tenting his skirt, as far I remember. So part of "enlarged armor" was groin, not chest (as the article seems to suggest). It's just a strong innuendo that "Caesar" has a humongous penis, not "well-endowed glory" (nice euphemysm for every man's pride, yeah). Why you run for Pompey, when I have THIS for you? asks "Caesar" and knocks "Senators" with his large... part of armor, obviously not a chest... We remember that the play is "vulgar ad crude", after all.

I just wanted to change such "copy&paste without understading" articles - there are more, but this one is the most spectacular misunderstanding.

Thanks for patience for troublemakers like me.