Thread:Fearless Diva/@comment-3452092-20180131174825/@comment-3452092-20180202032118

I definitely will not invest any more diamonds in the story if they follow the path you suggest and that includes in future playthroughs of It Lives In the Woods. I am invested in these characters, not those others. And if I find that it's pointless to get invested in other characters in the series to come, then I won't. If I stay invested, I will invest diamonds.

Obviously, they can do what they want. It's their story, their app. I will react accordingly.

Anyway, I did agree that your idea is more probable, but I am storyteller and if they won't tell the story I want to hear, well, then I'll just have to write it myself. Think of this as bouncing ideas around. I'd love to see them use this stort of stuff, but if they don't, I never really thought they would. The story thus far has been fairly predicatable. I don't see that changing anytime soon. Doesn't mean I can't play with the idea that it will throw a curveball at me. And if they did any of the stuff in this conversation, that would be a curveball.

This conversation isn't about probability, it's about plausiblity. What could they do not what will they do?