Talk:Desire & Decorum, Book 1/@comment-31553544-20181001005338/@comment-3452092-20181001010701

I think the problem isn't that they can't look it up so much as they want to catch the historical fiction fans and not deal with the actual historical facts. . . which is annoying the historical fiction fans, just a matter of how much. I like the story enough to keep watching, but I'm not sure I can get past the historical inaccuracies enough to support it by spending diamonds on it. If they will just give me Almack's or Debrit's I will consider it for that part of the story. And yes, I realize that is not the whole of everything from that time period, but it's something I really want to see. I've given up that they will handle inheritance law correctly and I am fed up with the PDA. Also I have a feeling that they are going to break another rule. Mr. Marlcaster cannot break off his betrothal to Miss Sutton without some serious repercussions. She can, but not him. Although who knows, maybe Miss Sutton will be the one to break it off, because at this point I'm pretty sure those two are not a possible end game. I could be surprised on that front, but it's really looking unlikely.