Thread:StoryGirl83/@comment-4786757-20180210061515/@comment-3452092-20180217025749

@Rebukulator Luther's looks okay with the bold. Kenna's looks like too much. I think that can be attributed to two things, with Kenna's it is longer and it is immediately followed by Kenna's signature, also in bold, so there is a sea of bold on hers while on his it's just three words. So I'm okay with bold, so long as it's limited, either in the quote or for the speaker's name, but not both. Oddly enough, I do think it needs to be somewhere, a way of sorts to keep your eye from passing over the quote, since the quote marks look pretty, but don't draw the eye enough for me.

As for the label, yes, I would say we agree on the label, but just to be sure, here is what I think. I think it should be the speaker's name. I don't think it should include who they are talking to or the topic of discussion. I'm about 50/50 on whether it should include a reference for where it came from (i.e. what book, what chapter). And, I figured out how to make those cute little reference quotes where you put a number next to the last word like this [1] except up a little and smaller and then list the information at the bottom of the page, so I'm almost inclined to suggest if we want that info, we use that method and put it at the bottom of the page. It might be overkill, but since it's an idea floating around in my head, I figured I would suggest it.

@Fearless Diva - Which one? We have three which we are trying to figure out what features of them that we like best and make it down to one. Or do you just mean in general?